Thursday 17 November 2016


Tom Huck

Tom Huck is a well-known printmaker, currently working in St. Louis, Washington.  In 1995 he received a masters in Printmaking from Washington University in St. Louis and he runs his own press there called “Evil Prints”.  He’s best known for his large scale satirical woodcuts which are impressively detailed.  His influences are Albrecht Durer, Jose Guadalupe Posada, Honore Daumier along with some other great masters of art. 

I’m a fan of his work.  I like that he works large scale and includes satire and humour in his work.  I’ve always loved making woodcuts and I intend to work large scale this year.  I’ve already made work that’s 180cm by 100cm and I find that my message is delivered more effectively at this size.  I have Tom Huck to thank for inspiring me to go this size and to use fine detail in places as well as incorporate humour and comedic qualities into my work.

Here’re some of his prints.
Image result for tom huck
 Image result for tom huck

Image result for tom huck

Image result for tom huck


Bill Fick


Bill Fick is a printmaker currently working in Durham in North Carolina.  He’s director of the art studio “Supergraphic” which is dedicated to producing satirical fine art prints and fine art media.  His work can be found in many places such as Harvard University, The New York Library, Fogg Art Museum and so on.  Bill has exhibited both nationally and internationally and he’s currently a visiting assistant professor in the Department of Art, Art History and Visual Studies at Duke University.  His work deals with satire as well as socio-political and scary themes which attempt to bridge the gap between fine art and lowbrow art (an underground visual art movement from the 1970’s).  Bill creates scary images that reflect people’s fear of anything unconventional and unfamiliar.


Bill’s work appeals to me for its satire and its bizarre and uneasy imagery.  The images are comical in my opinion as they take on strange unfamiliar characters who are often grinning, yet they have something sinister in their face we can’t really pin down.  They keep the viewer drawn to them as we’re trying to figure out the real emotional expression the characters are conveying.  My work deals with satire through bizarre imagery also and I hope to bring in sinister and evil aspects as time goes on. 


Here’s some of his work.
Image result for bill fick


Image result for bill fick


Image result for bill fick


Image result for bill fick
David Hayward


I enjoy art that exposes the loop holes and the faults of our society as well as being funny.  It's a change from the boring abstract and conceptually droll works I often see in gallery spaces.


David Hayward or "NakedPastor" is a cartoonist who takes on the loop holes of religion.  Like me, he works with satire, exposing everything wrong with religion.  His art is funny and speaks the truth.  While my art is political and not religious in any way, I was inspired by Hayward to look at what's going on in the world around me and laugh at how ridiculous it is.  Like me, Hayward uses the "one two punch" method of humour to make art.  First see the truth of the subject being ridiculed then laugh.


Here's the link to his website.


http://nakedpastor.com/2014/11/10-virtues-of-the-question/


Image result for david hayward artist


Related image


Related image


Image result for david hayward artist


Image result for david hayward artist


Image result for david hayward artist
Here's what the T-shirt looks like being worn.


Feels good seeing someone wearing something I made!

Moving onto my final piss take of Donald Trump.  After all the woodcutting my right hand was in bits!  So I moved onto a less intense method of printing, screen printing.  I hadn't done screen printing since 2nd year and it doesn't help that they're like a MILLION different steps in this process so it's safe to say I hadn't a clue what I was doing.  After many tears, screams and much needless frustration followed by more tears at the peril of my friends, I relearned how to screen print.  Go me! 


Anyway, I'd been working with black and white up to now so I wanted to bring colour back into my practice.  I like making work that's publically engaging so I started making T-shirts and selling them.  I used 5 colours, black, yellow, blue, green and brown.  Registration is also a massive pain in the ass, but I knew that going in.  This is the result of my effort as well as some preparatory work. 


Not bad for a guy who's so accident prone he could potentially burn a house down with a toothbrush.
(Wish I was joking).







Now here're the T-shirts.






Combined with the things Trump has said along with my own crude sense of humour, I thought this image to be an effective one.  I made 6 of these and sold all of them!  I didn't think they'd sell.  I didn't know there was a market for my sense of humour.  This was a happy discovery!  I want to make more T-shirts in the future but I think it's time I left the Donald alone for a while and pick on someone else.  Maybe he'll make a good president (fingers crossed!).
About half way through October I started my latest large scale woodcut. Here it is before I explain it. 




Here're a few close ups.



This took around 3 weeks to complete.  Its the same size as the last large woodcut (180cm by 1m).  Again, I printed it on paper and a bedsheet.  The paper print turned out good but the bedsheet had a problem with crumpling..... (can't blame a guy for trying).  The image is a fat cat with Donald Trump's hair looking mischievously as he's spraying cat stuff all over the word democracy.  (It's not peeing.  Aparently cats spray for some reason.  I don't know why.  It's digusting.  Ew).  The fat cat is a symbol for somebody who's well off  and who's also a liar.  Trump was notorious for lying during his campaign for presidency so I think this fits well.  Regarding the Cat-ass-trophy part, I took the word catastrophe and separated it into cat (for the big cat) and ass (for the spraying out of its ass... ew) to make a double pun, bringing in the humour part. 


While we're on the subject of nuclear weapons, America currently has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world, holding 6970 warheads.  There's also a list of the nuclear weapons the rest of the world has.  It's safe to say that we have enough nuclear weapons on this planet to obliterate all life on earth multiple times over.....  Yay..........  Here's a link to this uplifting info.....
http://www.icanw.org/the-facts/nuclear-arsenals/


I always found it funny that the leaders of these countries say they would never resort to nuclear warfare, yet they keep these weapons of mass destruction in reserve just in case.  Does this sound contradictory?  I think so.  Why would you hold onto something you never intend on using?  And why would you invest so much money into that thing you never intend on using???  These things aren't cheap!  Anyway I took an image on google of the Tsar Bomba which is the most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated and constructed by the Russians.  I know it's not American but America isn't far behind regarding the destruction of any given bomb.  And the US has more of them!


So I did a woodcut of this nuclear bomb and I put a face on it.  It's minding its own business and it's saying the phrase "They'd never use me!  But... Um... Just in case they uh..... need to."  Here it is.




This size is A1 and I carved and printed it over a 2 day period.  While this started on a comment on what Trump could do with nuclear weapons, it finished on what anybody could do with them.  I don't think it's fair to pick on Trump and leave everyone else out when it comes to nuclear warfare.  This is why I chose not to link the image to any country in the end.
While I was working on a second large scale print, I made some more woodblocks about what worried me about Trump.  The threat of a possible nuclear war was on my mind so I played with the idea of the destruction of America and possibly the world under an order from Trump.  These were some woodcuts I did.




This was just preliminary work which never turned large scale.  I attached Trump's hair to a nuclear bomb for the purpose of humour as well as conveying the message of the threat of a possible fallout under Trump.  While this is unlikely to ever happen, stranger things have occured in the past.


This is the final woodblock print.  It's 180cm by 1m.  This is the largest size the presses can print without bringing in a steam roller!  It's also the largest print I've ever done.  Since it's my final year of college I'm pushing myself to work on a much larger scale than what I'm used to.  I printed it on paper as well but this one is printed on a bed sheet because I wanted to make a banner out of it since the subject matter is political.  This print took me 9 days to carve and a day to draw the design on as I drew it from memory.  Since my project is about social commentary I wanted it to be open to the public so I hung it in the hall of the college the day Trump won the election so people could react to it.

I moved onto how I could joke about him being such a terrible presidential candidate.  Since making puns are what I do best anyway I wanted to incorporate this into my work!  I was baffled by just how little Trump seemed to know about the world and how much he didn't seem to care to find out about it.  He was very out of tune with world affairs and since Trump sounds similar to trumpet I came up with this image!



I edited this slightly by putting the butt of a shotgun at the end of the trumpet since Trump is so trigger happy and I put a stick of dynomite in the middle instead of the musical buttons because he will surely cause destruction if he does what he says he will do!


After the drawings, I wanted to be able to capture his features through woodcuts as this was the medium I was going to be using.  I planned on making these images large scale so I felt strongly that if they're big, they should be good!  So this is a practice woodcut I did before I moved onto the large scale pieces.






For an experiment and just for fun, I took the wood chippings I carved out of his hair and glued them back onto one of the prints to get the light colour in his hair.  This took ages and this was the outcome!




This was a pleasant moment of pure madness!  Cross hatching and tonal values are not a strong point for me so I have to work on this!
Before I could start ridiculing Donald Trump through my art practice, I had to be able to capture his main characteristics well.  These were his hair and his thin eyes along with his angry expression.  To me, he always looked like he was smelling something bad, so I tried to capture this.  The only thing is, portraiture is not one of my strong points!  So I had to work on this first.  While I was practicing this I was playing around with caricatures to add the humour aspect to the project.  These were my first attempts.






I drew multiple images from google first in my sketchbook and I moved into caricatures after.  I had a lot of fun doing these!!

Tuesday 8 November 2016

"Art and Laughter" by Sheri Klein is a very informative book for the subject I'm dealing with.  Between pages 16 and 18 it splits humour different categories and clearly defines all of them.  Now it's not just humour I'm working with.  Its parody, satire, puns, irony, paradox and dark humour.  Below I list the definitions in the book along with my own simplified definitions.


Parody
"Parodies gently mock art, cultural and historical icons through appropriating and altering images, and layering them with new meanings” (Page 13).


In other words, parodies are slightly altered icons which trigger a humorous response because they portray a different meaning to the original.  Often at times we can’t laugh at the original because it’s too serious or too well respected.  An example of a parody would be the Mona Lisa with a mustache.  This evokes a humorous response because it’s such a famous and respected painting.  Drawing a mustache takes all the seriousness out of it.
Satire
“Visual satire mocks art and life with zest and fury and asks us to pay attention to social norms, standards, morals and human foibles.  The visual satirist mimics the knowledge and behaviour of a culture or group to overemphasize and exaggerate aspects of life and its foibles with the hope of provoking laughter or a change in attitudes or ways” (page 16). 


In other words, satire uses the enforcement function of humour here in an attempt to provoke laughter while also making people aware of the errors of our world and hopefully attempt to correct them through non-violence.
Pun
“A pun can be described as an image with two or more concurrent meanings resulting in the understanding of images on more than one level” (page 17). 


In other words, an image or caption with more than one meaning.  Eg.  I can’t think of a joke about beavers.  Dam.


The word dam is related to beavers because they create them in their environment while damn is also the word we say when we can’t think of something.  So the word dam is the source of amusement here as it carries more than one meaning here.


Irony
“Irony is enabled by using words or a combination of words and images to express something completely different from the literal meaning of the word or subject” (Page 18-19).


In other words, an ironic response is responding with the opposite answer expected to any given question or statement.  For example, if someone drops a glass and it smashes into shards on the ground and someone says “well done”, that’s an ironic response.  It’s typically use to mock someone or something.


Paradox
“Paradox is incongruity achieved through the juxtaposition of images, words and images, techniques, media and/or ideas, and at first they can seem false, but then we see the contradictions made apparent and the revealing of something true” (Page 18).


In other words, it’s a sentence that contradicts itself and at first doesn’t make sense, however it makes the reader think, leading them to discover some hidden truth to it.


For example, Oscar Wilde is famously quoted as saying “I can resist anything but temptation”.


Other examples include “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” or “I am nobody” and so on.


Dark Humour
“Dark humour relies on the effect of morbidity, absurdity and anarchy.  Dark humour confronts topics such as death, chaos, violence, disasters and personal crises.  It provokes laughter in the face of tragedy” (Page 19). 


In other words, dark humour allows us to make light of terrible situations we would normally be traumatised by or deeply affected by such as those listed above.  This kind of humour is often the source of offence for many people as they feel like there are some things we shouldn’t joke about.  Some artists on the other hand delight in using this kind of humour to trigger a response from the audience.  Artists listed in this book include Patty Carroll, Red Grooms, Shag (Josh Agle), Isabel Samaras and Saul Steinberg.
On page 19, the book talks about the various techniques which can be used to trigger a laughter response.
Techniques to Trigger Laughter (Page 19)
  • Association – Two images put together giving contrasting effects.
  • Transposition – Relocating something in an unusual or new environment.
  • Transformation – Altering of a form.
  • Exaggeration – Change or distortion of a subject.
  • Disguise – Subtle change or meaning.
  • Appropriation – Altering a borrowed image.
  • Contradiction – Paradoxical or ironic compositions.




The essay "Humour used as a double edged sword" not only explains these theories and how they work, but it also talks about why we use humour and its four functions.


1) Identification
2) Clarification
3) Enforcement
4) Differentiation


The first 2 are used to unite people while the 2nd two are used divide certain groups from others.


Identification
This is an ice breaker.  This is when you're getting to know someone and want them to like you so you tell a joke to make them laugh.  Now the conversation is initiated and ye're now friends!


Clarification
This is putting forth an opinion.  You win over the approval of the people you're talking to by making a joke that makes them laugh and simultaneously agree with you. 


Enforcement
This corrects unacceptable behavior.  This would be when your friend does something stupid which ends badly for them and those involved.  His or her friends will make fun of them and joke at their stupidity.  As a result of this kind of humour, the individual will refrain from doing the act againg in case they get mocked.


Differentiation
This humour contrasts oneself from others when standing on a particular issue.  For example, if a non religious person jokes that God is an invisible floating man in the sky, they immediately separate themselves from religious people while also making alliances with non religious people in a comical manner.


I've looked at many websites (which are listed in a previous post) and read a couple of books on the subject of humour and how it works.  They all talk about these theories and functions in different ways.  The two sources that were of most use to me were "Humour as a double edged sword " by John C. Meyer and "The joke and its relation to the Unconscious" by Sigmund Freud.  Freud talks about the Analytical, the Synthetical and the Theoretical aspects of humour, however its along similar lines of what I've already explained. 
Now that I had my subject to ridicule (Donald Trump), I had to learn how to apply satire to the facts.  However at the start of the year I had no idea how humour worked.  All I knew was that surprise was a factor like saying unexpected things and I could judge the level of humour of an idea by how much I laughed at it myself.  After reading various essays and articles which are linked 3 posts previous to this one under the Donald Trump websites, I learned a little bit about how humour works.


There are currently 3 humour theories.


1) Superiority Theory
2) Relief Theory
3) Incongruity Theory (Dominant Theory)


Superiority Theory
This theory says that we laugh at unfortunate things which happen to others that are not currently happening to us, like someone slipping on a banana peel and falling.  Or all those epic fail compilations on YouTube we've all come to love and adore!  There is a problem with this theory though.  It doesn't always apply.  When we see homeless people or orphaned children, we don't laugh at them.  So while this theory has some merit, it doesn't explain everything we find funny.


Relief Theory
Relief theory says an amusing reaction is the result of built up feelings within us which no longer apply to a situation.  An example would be if a friend is telling us about money they sent to a relative abroad who recently passed away.  We build up empathetic feelings for the person.  If they go on to say they wasted money on them because they can't use it anymore, we see they don't care about the relative and they're heartless.  However we built up feelings of empathy which don't apply anymore so they're released through laughter or amusement.


Incongruity Theory
This is the most accepted theory today.  This theory says that laughter is triggered from interrupting our natural thinking pattern and presenting us with an outcome we never expected.  An example would be a Frankie Boyle joke.  "I got a book on cooking road kill the other day.  I tried one of the recipes and it was delicious!  But I still don't know what to do with his bike...."  The incongruity of this joke is when he mentions road kill, our natural thinking pattern thinks of birds, badgers or fox's etc.  However this thinking process is interrupted by the fact that he mentioned "bike" meaning the thing he killed was a human!  Now he goes from cleaning the road of a carcass and making use of it to being a murderer, a cannibal and a sociopath!  These are not outcomes we would expect from the joke but this surprise of incongruity is why we laugh.
So what makes Donald Trump so different from the rest of the other politicians?  While politicians are often greedy, corrupt and in power for their own benefit, I think Trump has set a new low standard.


After reading various articles about him which are linked in the previous post, I learned some scary things about him.  Here's what's on his to do list.


1) Build a wall between the US and Mexico to keep immigrants out.
2) Make Mexico pay for that wall.
3) Round up and deport the 12 million immigrants currently working in the U.S.
4) May use nuclear warfare (the U.S. has currently the highest nuclear arsenal in the world with 6970 warheads)
5) Encourage gun use under the 2nd amendment.


There's a lot more but these are a few things he want s to put forth.  These goals are chaotic and very unrealistic.  Building the wall is laughable.  Getting the Mexican people to pay for it is even more hilarious. 


Rounding up 12 million US immigrants and sending them home is immoral, impractical and impossible!  Most of these people are hardworking who do the jobs most Americans don't want to do anyway like driving taxis, being nannies, caretaking etc.  If they go, a large workforce will be terminated.  They probably won't want to go either so they'll be most likely be forced to leave at gun point!  It's a waste of money and deeply immoral.


Sam Harris makes these points very well as well as pointing out that Trump has very destructive views on reality.  Like the notion of human caused global warming is a "Chinese hoax meant to destroy our manufacturing base" (12:12 in youtube podcast, link below).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3RnrIZxGyE


Given that Trump has a frighteningly little grasp on reality, approves the use of guns and nuclear weapons, wants to spend money destroying Americas workforce and will spend whatever time he has in office spreading his hateful, racist ideology, there's no doubt that this guy is a dangerous candidate to be in the white house.  The American president is one of the most powerful people in the world today.  If Trump is granted this power, I would imagine all hell breaking loose.
For my 4th year studio project, I've reverted back to commenting on social issues in a satirical manner which is what I was doing in my 2nd year of college.  This year the most prominent issue that caught my attention was the possibility of having Donald Trump as the next American president.